Motor bike driver Oscar Nilsson is suing GM for claiming the Chevrolet Bolt was driving a rear-wheel drive driver in her own driving mode, “suddenly turning back to Nelson’s lane, hitting Nelson and placing him Knocked to the ground.
The accident took place on December 7, with heavy traffic in the Hayes Valley area of ??San Francisco, where GM reportedly flew 12 miles per hour and motorcycles were 17 miles per hour. The accident report submitted to California was contested with Nelson’s claim.
The report states that autonomous vehicles are traveling in the center of three one-way lanes. When available space is cut off by a braking vehicle, it attempts to enter the left lane, causing GM to abandon its movement and return to the center of the middle lane.
When Cruise AV was repositioning in the driveway, a motorbike split between two cars in the center and right lane drove into the center lane and glanced at the cruise AV side, shaking Slipped down, “the report said. “Motorcyclists decided to overtake and overtake another car without allowing safe driving.
Nelson was able to step the motorcycle to the curb before exchanging information with General Motors passengers and receiving medical care for shoulder pain.
Nielsen’s lawyer Sergei Lemberg challenged the report. He told the Mercury News: “After the fact, I do not know what a police officer can say.
GM said it intends to test self-driving under challenging conditions. A spokesman for General Motors told Jalopnik: “Safety is our focus during the development and testing of our autopilot technology and in this case, the San Francisco Police Department collision report determined that the motorcycle riders were merging into our lane before safe.”
The company has been testing its autos in San Francisco since August, allowing employees to back up the driver’s car behind the driver. In September, its car involved six trouble-free incidents.
Who should blame when technology is in the driver’s seat?
With more and more self-driving streets, lawsuits like Nelson are inevitable, but it highlights the plight of autonomous vehicles: who pays for the accident.
The test vehicle was clearly operated by the company that developed the technology, in this case General Motors, but once the vehicle was purchased and owned by the individual, the images that should be blamed became darker. Was it possible for the driver to take direct control of the vehicle and was responsible for all the operation of the vehicle?
It may be that the data collected by the vehicle is used as part of its operations to prove failure, but it remains to be seen whether companies operating these vehicles will want to set a precedent and abandon the data.
Professor Bryant Walker Smith of the University of South Carolina School of Law told The Mercury News that he expects the company to resolve the lawsuit promptly if they think there is a fault in his technology, but they will be fierce if other vehicles make mistakes Fight.
GM is not the only traditional carmaker to challenge Alphabet’s Waymo and Uber through autonomous driving. A car collision occurred at a car owned by Ford Motor Company Argo, two of whom were taken to the hospital recently.